My new pet
peeve is how toys are labeled for certain ages.
"This toy for ages 3-6 months" or "2+ only" or one of my favorites "Choking Hazard, 3+ only" on toys that are as small as a baseball. Really, a choking hazard? Is that like for elephants, or what? I know my kid can shove a heckofalotta food in his mouth, but a baseball sized toy? I'm not too worried.
As I was going through pictures from the last few months (I don't know if you have noticed I'm a bit behind in blogging, scrapbooking, and just "photo management" in general, but I am), I noticed how many toys we have that are not age-appropriate for Anders.
And here there are....
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b05ac/b05aca2b6cddd8965b9c813036c794b086838b96" alt=""
This puzzle we got from Joel's brother's family for Christmas.
It is for ages 2 & up.
Anders mastered it at 16 months.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/65f66/65f66e056ed54b8772ebdae8432a26d89b9f80d1" alt=""
These Wedgits (which I LOVE) are great.
They are for 2+ or maybe even 3+.
This one does say choking hazard.
The white piece you see by his foot are the smallest pieces.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/378c8/378c8175205c3b79e8bab8806360628230748580" alt=""
First of all, yes, Joel is wearing shorts.
Second of all, what Anders is opening is a flashlight
he got from Oma for Valentine's Day.
Age 3+.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8e2f8/8e2f8d71e17cfda1e3f3bb6d29a1216be523c3b3" alt=""
This great Bucket-O-Blocks is for 2+.
He got it on his first birthday and
has been playing with the blocks & tub ever since.
Wearing crazy outfits is not required.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/76329/763297317c777060ceb164f468a539bc2e75bf00" alt=""
I bought him this ball recently.
It has a handle on it so you can sit on it and bounce,
although his legs are no where near long enough.
Yet.
Ages 3+
Now that I look back, 4 out of 5 of these were gifts.......